Joe Biden Coming For Your Appliances

The Biden administration recently unveiled regulations targeting multiple home and commercial appliances, which will impact the pocketbooks and comfort of millions of Americans. Biden’s Department of Energy (DOE) finalized new energy efficiency standards for residential refrigerators and freezers and proposed standards for commercial fans and blowers. DOE’s standards for refrigerators and freezers will be implemented between 2029 and 2030, and take less efficient and less expensive models off the market, limiting consumer choice. The standards for fans and blowers are the first federal regulations targeting those appliances. According to DOE, the proposed standards “follows the lead” of efficiency standards established by California—a state whose regulations and standards the Biden administration likes to imitate.

The Biden administration tends to inflate the benefits of its analyses by using assumptions that provide the answers it wants. For example, in EPA’s power plant rule, the administration assumed that technologies such as hydrogen and carbon capture and sequestration were currently available to reach the conclusions they wanted. Refrigerator standards are much like dishwashers and clothes washer standards where there have been so many revised standards over the decades that they come at diminishing returns or negative returns. In the past, some standards have increased the upfront cost of the appliance more than the projected savings from lower energy costs.

Regardless, the Biden administration finds positive returns to support the finalization of its standards due to hidden assumptions in its models, which result in higher cost products for Americans that may not work as well. For example, new standards for dishwashers have led to cycles taking as much as twice as long to finish. The new DOE standards take choice away from American consumers, who can decide for themselves what is best for their needs. The standards substitute consumer choice for authoritarian dictates, not only for consumers, but also for manufacturers.

Biden’s Copious List of New Standards

According to DOE, the administration proposed or finalized a total of 30 regulations in 2023 as part of President Biden’s climate agenda and has pledged to continue moving forward with more regulations in 2024. According to experts, the Biden administration’s energy efficiency actions will ultimately harm consumers and drive prices higher since manufacturers will be forced to adopt newer technologies to achieve the standards that do not necessarily benefit consumers. For example, DOE’s efficiency standards for stovetops proposed in February compromises some of the features that gas stove users want, while saving an insignificant amount of energy. According to the agency’s analysis, those standards would effectively ban half of all available gas stoves.

After DOE released its proposed stovetop regulations, it proposed regulations for clothes washers and refrigerators in February; finalized standards for air conditioners in March; proposed regulations on dishwashers in May; issued a proposal targeting water heaters in July; and proposed standards for furnaces in September. The Biden administration is not just tweaking regulations, it is effectively banning whole categories of appliance that are sold on the market to advance the President Biden’s climate agenda. Green energy groups want to electrify homes and businesses, reducing reliance on natural gas while simultaneously demanding replacement of current fossil fuel-fired power with intermittent and unreliable wind and solar power because the commercial and residential sectors account for over 30 percent of total end-use carbon dioxide emissions in the United States–the largest share of any sector including industry, transportation and agriculture. Fossil fuels, however, allow people to work at jobs and provide Americans with a livable environment in their homes and places of business.

Industry is challenging DOE’s Furnace Standard

The natural gas industry is challenging the Biden administration over its regulations targeting traditional gas-powered residential furnaces. The American Gas Association (AGA), whose members provide natural gas to more than 74 million customers nationwide, several trade associations and one manufacturer recently filed the legal challenge against the Department of Energy (DOE) over the regulations.
The DOE’s finalized regulations, which are slated to go into effect in 2028, require furnaces to achieve an annual fuel utilization efficiency (AFUE) of 95 percent, meaning manufacturers would only be allowed to sell furnaces that convert at least 95 percent of fuel into heat within six years. The current market standard AFUE for a residential furnace is 80 percent.

Because the regulation effectively bans the sale of a large number of gas furnaces that consumers want, AGA said that DOE needs a solutions-oriented approach to energy conservation that protects consumers and ensures continued availability of low-cost, low-emission natural gas furnaces. According to AGA President and CEO Karen Harbert its 114 pages of comments have been summarily ignored by DOE. The regulations impact 55 percent of American households and would lead to higher costs for 30 percent of senior households, 27 percent of small businesses and 26 percent of low-income households.

Conclusion

The finalized and proposed standards will increase the demand for electricity and with it the cost of electricity to consumers. Residential electricity prices have increased 21 percent since Biden took office as his climate agenda is attempting to replace coal and natural gas generators with mostly intermittent and unreliable wind and solar power. While the displacement has retired a large number of coal plants and some gas plants, the share of coal and gas power to the total has only declined by a single percentage point since Biden took office as the capacity factors of wind and solar power are much lower than fossil fuel plants. But it has affected the reliability of the power grid, with little new firm capacity that can reliably meet new demand, as Senator Joe Manchin points out below.

Senator Joe Manchin, a Democrat from West Viriginia and Chairman of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee has pushed back against the Biden administration’s regulations targeting home appliances. Manchin criticized DOE’s aggressive energy efficiency rulemakings, arguing the agency should allow the free market to improve product technology rather than force such changes through regulation. According to Manchin, “It absolutely shows you how disconnected the [DOE] is with the facts and reality of what’s happening to the grid system.” “We’ve had so many warnings from [the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission] and [North American Electric Reliability Corporation] and everybody else that the grid is strained to say the least.” “And we’re taking more dispatchable power off the grid. That means 24/7, mostly fossil — because of the movement of this administration. It is putting us in the danger zone, the grid,” he continued. “With all the movement and demand for more electric appliances that would take the place of gas whether it be a stove or furnace. It absolutely makes no sense and is not in check with reality. Absolutely not.”


*This article was adapted from content originally published by the Institute for Energy Research.

The Unregulated Podcast 165: Like Father, Like Daughter

On this episode of The Unregulated Podcast Tom Pyle discuss John Kerry’s departure of the Biden administration and the special, special role he, and his family, have played in developing Biden’s policies.

Links:

AEA Joins Broad Coalition Urging Senators to Reject the PROVE IT Act

WASHINGTON DC (01/18/2024) – In advance of today’s Senate Environment & Public Works Committee markup of S. 1863, the PROVE IT Act of 2023, a coalition of more than 40 organizations sent a letter urging Congress to reject the legislation. The PROVE IT Act directs the U.S. Department of Energy to set up the necessary infrastructure to tax imported goods based on their carbon dioxide content, which would then be used to establish a tax on energy intensive imports and then later a domestic tax on carbon dioxide.

AEA President Thomas Pyle issued the following statement:

“The PROVE IT Act is a backdoor attempt to impose carbon dioxide taxes on the American public without so much as an up or down vote. If Senator Kevin Cramer, the bill’s sponsor, believes we should increase the price of energy – along with everything that is grown, made or transported with energy – then he should be honest with his constituents instead of hiding behind rhetoric about getting tough on China.

The American people know that any tax on imported goods will be paid for by families and businesses, not Chinese companies. If Senator Cramer really opposes carbon taxes, then he should prove it by withdrawing his legislation.”

A copy of the letter can be found here.

Additional Resources:


For media inquiries please contact:
[email protected]

New Survey, Same Results: Americans Reject Carbon Dioxide Taxes in Favor of Affordable and Reliable Energy

WASHINGTON DC (01/09/2024) – The American Energy Alliance and the Committee to Unleash Prosperity recently sponsored a survey of 1600 likely voters equally divided among eight States (Georgia, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Arizona, Nevada, Michigan, Missouri, and Ohio) conducted by MWR Strategies in December 2023. The total sample margin of error is 2.45 percent.

The survey results confirm that there has been little change in sentiment and attitudes on energy and climate change. Many of the responses in the survey are either consistent with or more emphatic than what we have found in previous surveys.

For example, just 3 percent of respondents identified climate change as the most pressing issue facing the United States, compared to the 59 percent that identified the economy as either the first or second most important issue facing the United States. 51 percent of all voters (including 63 percent of Republicans) oppose a carbon dioxide or energy tax on imported goods. When asked what they would be willing to pay each year to address climate change, the median response was 10 dollars, and 35 percent (including 17 percent of Democrats) said they were unwilling to pay anything.

AEA President Thomas Pyle issued the following statement:

“The results reconfirm what we already knew: voters are not willing to pay any tax associated with carbon dioxide or energy – including a carbon dioxide or energy tax on imported goods. Those who believe in limited government and free energy markets continue to be allied with the vast majority of voters concerning the destructive and pointless nature of carbon dioxide taxes and on the fundamentals of the climate change issue.”

Steve Moore, of the Committee to Unleash Prosperity, noted:

“These survey results show Americans care most about their wallets and their access to reliable and affordable energy, not the radical green energy agenda Joe Biden has embraced.”


Additional Resources:


For media inquiries please contact:
[email protected]

The Unregulated Podcast #163: A Feature, Not a Bug

On this episode of The Unregulated Podcast Tom Pyle and Mike McKenna discuss what’s on the agenda for Congress in the new year.

Links:

The Unregulated Podcast #162: 2024 Predictions

On this episode of The Unregulated Podcast Tom Pyle and Mike McKenna make bold predictions on how anno Domini 2024 will unfold.

Links:

The Unregulated Podcast #161: Don’t Marginalize My Experiences

On this episode of The Unregulated Podcast Tom Pyle and Mike McKenna discuss how to best celebrate during the holiday Christmas season, the latest from the 2024 presidential race, and the future of American automotive production.

Links:

They Might as Well Call it a Least Sale 

WASHINGTON DC (12/20/2023) – President Biden’s Department of Interior finalized the 2024-2029 National Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Leasing Program on Friday with the fewest oil and gas lease sales in history. There will be a maximum of three lease sales in the Gulf of Mexico scheduled over the five years, and no sales will occur off the east and west coasts or offshore Alaska.

AEA President Thomas Pyle issued the following statement:

“While President Biden continues to blame oil and gas companies for high energy prices, his Department of Interior has done the absolute minimum forced upon them by law and demanded by the courts with respect to this latest leasing plan.

This latest attack on the oil and gas industry provides further warning to companies eager to invest in American energy and endangers our economic and national security. All President Biden’s offshore program will do is offshore our oil and production to other nations, like Iran and Venezuela.”

Additional Resources:

For media inquiries please contact:
[email protected]

Biden Now Coming For Your Family’s Air Conditioner

The United States is among 63 countries to join a pledge to cut cooling-related emissions at the United Nations climate summit in Dubai (COP 28). The Global Cooling Pledge includes cutting emissions not only from air conditioning but also from refrigeration for food and medicine and even medical devices such as MRI machines. It commits countries to reduce by 2050 their cooling-related emissions by at least 68 percent from 2022 levels, along with a suite of other targets including establishing minimum energy performance standards for air conditioning by 2030.

Installed global cooling capacity is expected to triple by mid-century, driven by increasing temperatures, growing populations and rising incomes as 1.2 billion people in 77 countries who lack access to cooling, seek it.  And even with increasingly energy-efficient technology, electricity use is expected to more than double, threatening to strain electricity grids, particularly in developing economies. By 2050, 67 percent of cooling capacity is expected to be in developing countries, up from less than 50 percent now. Emissions from cooling are expected to reach between 4.4 billion and 6.1 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent by 2050.

Emissions from both the refrigerants and cooling currently account for about 7 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions and, if current trends hold, 10 percent of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions in 2050 could come from air-conditioning and other efforts to keep cool. About 3 billion more air conditioners are expected to be installed around the world beyond the roughly 2 billion currently in place. China serves as a prime example, with energy demand for space cooling increasing 13 percent per year since 2000, on average, and a manufacturing sector responsible for 70 percent of window units sold worldwide. China has not signed the pledge.

Achieving the pledge’s commitments will require major investment in more sustainable cooling technology, aided by government incentives and bulk procurement. It also would need electric grids to switch to renewables, as today’s use of air conditioning and fans accounts for nearly 20 percent of global electricity consumption. Switching to renewable energy would reduce the emissions from the electric sector needed to power air conditioners. The Global Cooling Pledge adds to efforts started under the 2016 Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol, which calls for a gradual reduction in the production and consumption of hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) in cooling technologies.

India is expected to see the greatest growth in demand for cooling in the coming decades, but has not joined the pledge. Indian government officials indicated that they were not willing to undertake targets above those committed to in 1992 under the multilateral Montreal Protocol to regulate production and consumption of ozone depleting chemicals and hydrofluorocarbons used in cooling.

Given that the United States has signed onto the cooling pledge suggests there could be more regulations or incentives to come for that industry in the United States. Progress on meeting the cooling pledge will be tracked on an annual basis until 2030, with check-ins at the yearly U.N. climate summits. The pledge calls for signatories to publish their own national cooling action plans by 2026, and to commit to supporting the deployment of highly efficient air conditioning technologies. It includes a commitment to improve the efficiency of new air-conditioners by 50 percent.

Air Conditioning (AC) Technology

Conventional ACs are energy intensive due to processes for eliminating humidity. Conventional ACs transfer heat outside by converting gas refrigerants to liquid and back again, which generates cooling. Removing humidity requires cooling air to the point at which water vapor becomes a liquid to be drained. The inability to get rid of humidity without first cooling the air makes conventional ACs less efficient.

While companies have prototypes that produce fewer emissions than traditional ACs, there are currently no plans to bring them to market soon because they are not economic due to material costs and supply chain issues. Market research suggests people are not willing to pay as much as 150 percent more for an AC, pointing out that policies and incentives are needed to lower consumer costs. Governments could implement stricter energy performance standards, clearer efficiency labelling, subsidies or bulk procurement to stimulate demand and lower costs. And, import tariffs could help prevent inefficient, second-hand models being resold in developing countries.

According to the New York Times, many new advancements and actions — including adopting “passive” cooling technology like improved insulation and reflective surfaces — can help with cooling without significantly increasing energy use. Bolstering energy efficiency, as well as phasing down refrigerant gases, can help reduce cooling-related emissions. Adopting building energy codes that explicitly incorporate “passive” cooling, like designs that increase natural shade and ventilation, can also be effective, although they can increase up-front costs for new construction and add significant costs for retrofitting existing buildings. One estimate has those passive cooling measures — coupled with faster improvements in energy efficiency and a more stringent phase out of hydrofluorocarbons — reducing projected 2050 emissions by over 60 percent.

Conclusion

COP 28 has come up with a Global Cooling Pledge to reduce greenhouse gases coming from cooling and refrigeration by 68 percent by 2050, despite the world likely almost tripling its use of air conditioning in the future as 1.2 billion people try to acquire it. Since the United States has joined the pledge, Americans can expect more regulations and incentives to reduce the comfort of cooling that has raised productivity tremendously in this country and the world since World War II. The outcome will raise energy prices for Americans and the cost of new more efficient technology as those technologies are still not economic due to material costs and supply chain issues. This agreement, and other COP agreements, should not be binding on the United States because the Constitution reserves any agreement with other countries to require compliance by the Senate via the Treaty approval authority, although the Biden Administration is expected to argue that the United States is bound by its signature.

biofuels.


*This article was adapted from content originally published by the Institute for Energy Research.

Gavin Newsom: Californians Don’t Pay Enough For Gasoline

Governor Gavin Newsom claims oil companies are price gouging, which is the reason that gasoline prices are almost $2 more than the national average price in his state. Californians are paying almost $5 a gallon for regulated unleaded gasoline, while the nation is averaging $3.25 a gallon. Newsom does not believe that California’s high taxes and endless regulations should make that much of a difference in the gas price, so it must be price gouging. He is also not admitting to the fact that California’s gasoline is a “boutique” fuel that only refineries in California produce and that he and President Biden are paying those refiners incredible subsidies to switch to biofuels, limiting supply. Clearly, economics is not a forte’ of the governor for economics 101 tells you that if you limit supply without reducing demand, prices will go up. It is no wonder that Californians are migrating to Texas and Florida. Gas prices in Florida, for example, average about $3.00 a gallon. And, even though California is all-in on green energy, the air quality is better in Florida and Texas than in California.

Source: Committee to Unleash Prosperity

California’s Higher Gasoline Taxes

California has the highest gas tax in the country at 68 cents per gallon, compared to 39 cents for the national average, and the state requires a special blend of gasoline that is more expensive to produce. California also has a cap-and-trade program and low-carbon fuel standard that add about another 46 cents a gallon. Those two taxes explain about 75 cents of the difference between the California gas price and the national average.

California’s Refinery Situation

California lost 12 percent of its refining capacity between 2017 and 2021 and is set to lose another 8 percent by the end of 2023. California refineries, as well as other U.S. refineries, have been closing due to an onerous regulatory environment, rich inducements to switch to biofuels and demand destruction due to COVID lockdowns. Many refineries are converting to producing biofuels that are more profitable because of large government subsidies and higher profits.  In California, refiners can receive as much as $3.70 per gallon in benefits by switching to producing biofuels instead of making petroleum-based products. The majority of the costs of these significant refinery transitions, however, must be paid for in the sale of products.

The refinery situation in California will get worse as Phillips 66 and Marathon Petroleum are permanently converting their East Bay refineries that currently make gasoline to produce renewable, bio-based diesel fuel from plant-based materials. That means there will be a penalty at the pump for gasoline consumers as there will be fewer sources to produce gasoline. Not enough gasoline in a state mostly using gasoline cars means higher priced gasoline. That could mean that California will need to import its specialized gasoline blend from refineries overseas that have the ability to produce it and ship it by ocean tankers, which will be more expensive for consumers. The last major refinery built in California was in 1968 when Valero built the Benicia refinery that has a capacity of 145,000 barrel per day. In 1968, Ronald Reagan was the governor of California and Lyndon Johnson was president.

Due to California’s limited refinery capacity, its gasoline prices are volatile to output disruptions. The fuel delivery system in California runs up against capacity limits all the time. For instance, California’s refineries remained at full capacity during the summer driving season to meet demand, delaying maintenance and repairs. During the summer months, oil refineries in California are required to produce a special blend of gasoline that limits negative effects on air quality that are more pronounced due to the summer heat and California’s unique geography. Gasoline prices in California this past summer were averaging around $6.00 a gallon. After the summer, refineries produce winter blends that are less expensive, normally beginning October 31. Because of the high summer prices, Newsom issued an order in September for state regulators to allow oil refineries to produce winter blend gasoline sooner, bringing gasoline prices down. His actions are proof that much of California’s cost differential is self-induced.

California’s Oil Production

California is the seventh largest producer of oil in the United States, but produces less than 1 percent of the oil it consumes daily, importing oil mainly from Ecuador, Saudi Arabia, Iraq and Colombia. As the state puts more restrictions on oil production, it may need to import even more of its oil. The state’s climate bill requires that new oil and gas wells or wells that are being reworked must be set back at least 3,200 feet from homes, schools and hospitals, and imposes strict pollution controls on existing wells within that distance. Companies with existing oil and gas wells within the buffers are required to monitor emissions, control dust and limit night-time noise and light.  It is estimated that about 2.7 million Californians live within 3,200 feet of the existing oil and gas wells, and cities are sprouting up around oil wells that have been producing oil in California in some cases for a century. Some California localities are even banning new drilling. Los Angeles County, for example, blocked new oil and gas drilling and is phasing out existing operations, expanding on a city-wide ban.

Further, California has put a near halt on issuing permits for new oil and gas drilling. The state’s Geologic Energy Management Division approved seven new active drilling well permits in the first half of 2023, which compares with over 200 it had issued by the same time last year. The delay in approvals is due to California’s progressive environmental laws and standards against fossil fuels despite its role as a major oil producer and a major oil-consuming state. While new drilling permits have steadily declined since Gavin Newsom became governor in 2019, the current rate of approval represents a sudden and dramatic drop. At mid-year, the oil industry had more than 1,400 permit applications for new wells awaiting state approval, half of which were over a year old. Newsom wants to phase out oil drilling in the state by 2045. Federal drilling permits for California have also dropped–from 166 to just 3 for the first 6 months of fiscal year 2023 from the same period in fiscal year 2022.

Further, California’s Assembly Bill 1167 deals with the issue of orphaned oil wells, which currently lack viable owners or operators. The bill requires full bonding for plugging and remediating these wells when transfers of ownership occur despite the state already having measures in place.  It is yet another straw piled atop the camel’s back.

And, California’s new Climate Disclosure Law also affects oil companies operating in the state. Bill SB 253 will require about 5,000 companies to report the amount of greenhouse gas emissions that are both directly emitted by their operations and the amount of indirect emissions coming from such activities as employee business travel, waste disposal and supply chains. The law applies to public and private businesses that make more than $1 billion annually and operate in California. The companies are required to disclose their emissions starting in 2027. The law is being paired with another new law that requires companies with revenue over $500 million to report their climate-related risks.

California vs. Florida Air Quality

Even with all the environmental regulations and energy restrictions, California air quality is not the best in the nation. In fact, California has the worst air quality in the nation with only 60.60 percent of good air quality days. In 2018, across 112 cities, California averaged a PM2.5 concentration of 12.1 micrograms per cubic meter (μg/m3), which is considered moderate. Only 35.7 percent of its cities met the World Health Organization (WHO) target for annual PM2.5 exposure of 10 μg/m3, as compared to the national average of 81.7 percent.

According to the American Lung Association, California leads the charts for cities with the worst air pollution. The top four cities in the country with the worst air quality are located in the state: Los-Angeles-Long Beach, Visalia, Bakersfield, and Fresno-Madera-Hanford. California’s air quality is hampered by increasingly frequent and severe wildfires, mountainous terrain that traps pollution, and a warm climate that contributes to ozone formation.

In contrast, the PM2. 5 concentration in Florida is below the recommended limit given by the WHO air quality guidelines. Florida also has a warm climate, but controls its brush and forests with controlled fires. Florida ranks 7th in the nation for good air quality with 89.80 percent of good air quality days.

Conclusion

Governor Newsom is making matters worse for Californians with its climate laws and regulations that are supposed to make its air quality better, which is the worst in the nation. Instead, those laws and rules are increasing prices for its residents, and those prices are likely to get worse rather than better. In particular, its gasoline prices are likely to increase due to restrictions to limit oil production, its limited refinery capacity, its specialized requirements for the fuel, and its huge inducements to refiners to stop making gasoline and switch to making biofuels.


*This article was adapted from content originally published by the Institute for Energy Research.